Labour MP Louisa Wall has responded to claims that marriage equality is a stepping stone towards polygamy and says that nowhere in the world has this been the case.
Research polls commissioned by the Herald on Sunday have found that 53.9 per cent of Kiwis support marriage equality and 38.1 per cent do not. They also show that older generations were less likely to support marriage equality.
Family First national director, Bob McCoskrie, has responded to the poll results by saying that they show a decline in support of marriage equality and that a law change would only lead to polygamy.
“If you’re talking about real equality that means it should be available to anybody. That includes three or four who want to get married, that includes teenagers who want to get married, married people who want to marry somebody else at the same time” says McCoskrie.
“It’s on the agenda and everybody knows it. It’s on the long-term agenda” he says.
Louisa Wall has responded to the conservative leaders comments and says “The argument that marriage equality leads to polygamy is wrong. Suggestions that hordes of teenagers and men choosing to have more than one wife are going to jostle for marriage licenses are far-fetched and misleading.”
“Fear mongers will argue that equality opens the institution of marriage up to relationships involving more than 2 people. What it actually means is that the law — and the social and civil institutions that the law governs — apply equally to everyone. It means that a couple, who so choose, can apply for and receive a marriage licence from the State.”
“We live in a democracy – one person, one vote i.e. equal citizenship and the laws of New Zealand applying equally to all its citizens.”
We have heard those who oppose marriage equality speak of their fears surrounding the redefinition of marriage. Wall responds to those fears and says “Our 1955 Marriage Act has never defined marriage – there is a current convention and I note marriage is an evolving institution. My bill seeks to confirm that two consenting adults that are not prohibited to marry as per the Marriage Act can obtain a marriage license from the State. It is that simple.
“My bill is concerned with defining who can get a marriage license from the State if they choose to, not how, where and who marries them.
“I ask for societal change beyond tolerance – what we need is genuine acceptance. We are all equal human beings and so are equally entitled to the State institution of marriage, a commitment of love and family between two people” she says.
Wall says that the facts surrounding same sex marriage and polygamy show the polar opposite to what McCoskrie is suggesting. “No country that has legalised polygamy recognises marriage equality, whereas the 11 countries that have legalised marriage equality outlaw polygamy.”
“Polygamy- Bigamy is illegal in New Zealand under the Crimes Act 1961, S 205. No country that has legalised polygamy recognises marriage equality, whereas the 11 countries that have legalised marriage equality outlaw polygamy.”
None of the 50 countries who have legalised polygamy have legal status of marriage equality and for 37 of 50, homosexual law reform is yet to be achieved.
List of countries with status of polygamy recognized under civil law, same-sex sexual activity status and relationship recognition.
Afghanistan – illegal – death penalty – no relationship recognition
Algeria – illegal – fine + 2-24 months imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Bahrain – illegal – criminal code silent – no relationship recognition
Bangladesh – illegal – 10 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Brunei – illegal male – 10 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Burkina Faso – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Cameroon – illegal – fine and 5 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Chad – LEGAL since 1967 - no relationship recognition
Central African Republic – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Comoros – illegal – fine and 5 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Congo – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Djibouti – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Egypt – LEGAL as not specifically outlawed but they have “public morality” laws - no relationship recognition
Ethiopia – illegal – up to 15 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Gabon – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
The Gambia – illegal – up to 14 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
India – LEGAL 2009 - no relationship recognition
Indonesia – LEGAL except Muslims in Aceh province - no relationship recognition
Iran – illegal – death penalty – no relationship recognition
Iraq – LEGAL 2003 although vigilantes have applied Sharia law (executions) - no relationship recognition
Jordan – LEGAL although vigilante honor killings (executions) – no relationship recognition
Kuwait – illegal – fine and U 21 years imprisonment up to 10 years + over 21 years
imprisonment up to 7 years – no relationship recognition
Libya – illegal – up to 5 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Malaysia – illegal – up to 20 years imprisonment, fines and whippings – no relationship recognition
Maldives – illegal – no penalty but shariah laws may apply – no relationship recognition
Mali – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Mauritania – illegal – death penalty – no relationship recognition
Morocco – illegal – up to 3 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Myanmar (Burma) – illegal – up to 10 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Niger – LEGAL - no relationship recognition
Oman – illegal – fines and up to 3 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Pakistan – illegal, Sharia law maybe applied and 2 years up to life imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Palestine – illegal male Gaza up to 10 years imprisonment AND LEGAL 1951 West Bank – both no relationship recognition
Qatar – illegal – up to 5 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Saudi Arabia – illegal – death penalty or fines, whipping and or imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Senegal – illegal – fines and up to 1-5 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Singapore – illegal men – up to 2 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Somalia – illegal – no relationship recognition
Sri Lanka – illegal penalty is fine or whipping – no relationship recognition
Sudan – illegal – death penalty for men 3rd offense and women 4th offense – no relationship recognition
Syria – illegal – up to 3 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Tanzania – illegal – up to life imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Togo – illegal – fine and/or 3 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
Uganda – illegal men – up to life imprisonment and illegal women from 2000 – no relationship recognition
United Arab Emirates – illegal – deportation, fines, imprisonment or death penalty – no relationship recognition
Yemen – illegal – flogging or death – no relationship recognition
Zambia – illegal – up to 14 years imprisonment – no relationship recognition
| Sarah Murphy



Louisa, where’s the equality when religious organisations, under the Anti-Discrimination Act, continue to say we’re immoral? Heterosexuals aren’t subject to that.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
Louisa, South Africa’s President, Jacob Zuma, has four wives, whilst allowing queer marriage.
Like or Dislike:
1
1
I want four husbands!
Like or Dislike:
1
1
Good point Oscar. It certainly doesn’t help when government legislation says we’re immoral. Even if gay marriage is legalised, who are we going to marry? Other gay people? What if you’re not attracted to them? With present religious views, that’s all we’ve to choose from.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Hmm. A secular government allowing religious organisations to discriminate against us! Don’t we pay the same taxes?
Like or Dislike:
2
0
Sure Air New Zealand’s not been making jokes about the United Arab Emirates’ death penalty?
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Louisa’s right about one thing. We live in a democraZy!
Like or Dislike:
0
0